SCS Sentinel OPEN 2 Manuel D'installation page 51

>
risk analysis and elimination
The risks arising from a swing gate with 2 leaves and the solutions adopted to eliminate them are
indicated in the fi gure below:
5
mandatory
slide stop
Primary edges • Risk of impact and crushing (in the motion space
1
or on the limit stop)
Eliminated by: the amperometric sensor and photoelectric cells
Between secondary edges and pillars
2
• Risk of hands being crushed and cut.
Solution: safe distance.
Depending on your installation, there may be a shear zone. In that case, you must eliminate
this zone by leaving a gap of at least 10 cm, either by moving the side limit stops or by cutting
the corner of the pillars without weakening them, or both if necessary. If that is not possible,
the risk must be indicated visually.
Between the gate and the motors
3
• Risk of crushing.
Solution: safe distance.
If the installation complies with the specifi cations in this manual:
• There is a risk of crushing between the gate and the base of the
motor.
Users must be warned of this risk.
• There isn't a risk of crushing between the end of arm and the gate
• There is a risk of shearing
Between the lower edge and the ground
4
• Risk of feet being caught.
Solution: safe distance.
Depending on the installation, there may be a
danger area for feet between the lower edge
of the gate and the ground. In that case, it
is advisable to eliminate this area by leaving
a gap of at least 12 cm or by limiting it to no
more than 5 mm.
EN ::: 9
2
3
4
1
3
4
2
5
mandatory
slide stop
EN FR