SCS Sentinel Kit automatisme vérins Manuel D'installation Et D'utilisation page 55

>
risk analysis and elimination
the risks arising from a swing gate with 2 leaves and the solutions adopted to eliminate them are indicated
in the figure below:
Primary edges • Risk of impact and crushing (in the motion space or on the limit stop)
1
eliminated by: the amperometric sensor and photoelectric cells
Between secondary edges and pillars • Risk of hands being
2
crushed and cut.
Solution: safe distance.
Depending on your installation, there may be a shear zone. In
that case, you must eliminate this zone by leaving a gap of at
least 10 cm, either by moving the side limit stops or by cutting
the corner of the pillars without weakening them, or both if
necessary. If that is not possible, the risk must be indicated
visually.
Between the gate and the cylinders
3
• Risk of crushing.
Solution: safe distance.
If the installation complies with the specifications in this manual:
• There is no risk of crushing between the gate and the base of the
cylinder.
• There is a risk of crushing between the end of the cylinder and the gate.
users must be warned of this risk.
Between the lower edge and the ground
4
• Risk of feet being caught.
Solution: safe distance.
Depending on the installation, there may be a
danger area for feet between the lower edge of
the gate and the ground. In that case, it is
advisable to eliminate this area by leaving a gap
of at least 12 cm or by limiting it to no more than 5 mm.
en ::: 9
2
3
4
1
3
4
2
EN